Missing 90 Hindus of more than 28 bodies found(Pour the dried bodies of age (in the under 10)
Ps (ARSA) violence Cheating multiple attacks 28 out of 100 missing brother Township Hindus According to identify the body of some Hindus position will be buried in two pits security group that was discovered 24 days of September.
Tiger comrades Maungdaw regions (in the village) and Mann, a village of about 100 Hindus to occur on August 25, the region lost in the process of a second terrorist attack in Maungdaw. Bangladesh Bangladesh side here Maung Township, a member of the local Hindu terrorist attack, who fled to Sittwe from Maungdaw four miles to the mall (Hindus aid) phone contact on August 25, ARSA 300 extremist terrorist soldier, Tiger Village About 100 women in the back of the village was arrested and reached about 1,000 meters long, Killing eight women, women are forced to enter into Islam Bangladesh had a sense that the two countries were taken on September 24, the government announced.
Government Office on September 24, at 7 o'clock in the morning after the driver's Village, a haven The male and female, Mann Village and Hindu religious leaders, including some relevant joint security team Tiger comrades near the village has to search around. About 1,200 meters north of the village to the ground, find all the details later အပုပ်နံ့ရ. buried in Beijing with two holes of the 20 children and eight women were found in dishes released report. Excavation of bodies received by Hindu religious groups (under 10), six reports included a statement.
(1) The Border Guard Administration Police, Supervisory officers to the police chief of San Lwin, '' Comrade Tiger Village (Hindu villages, lies the village) (Bengali) When searching around the village lies at the foot of the village's west near the Hindu people believed that buried about 12 feet wide, When we dug to a depth of about three feet hole saw 12 bodies. The other troops have found 16 bodies. The third drawing, but found a hole, none bury anything, '' he said.
The bodies found ARSA Terrorist reflecting outages, leading to international terrorism and said he will inform the media publicly identified. I found a list of those still missing would be designated as search said. Government bodies received by the excavation of the necessary checks are made and will continue to search report.
Abducted eight women and resurface on the information obtained, the police chief San Lwin '' (Bengali) anymore because they are easy to look like you just took. Two days on the road. I was raped. The other contrast media in the country met, either Hindu village in Rakhine and the military that I had to lie. Avoid them adults cut up ARSA terrorist groups. Muslims turn when strange. Wrists are bound to occur when I asked the reporter, '' he explained.
At present, the six women in Bangladesh Bangladesh consume to help refugees living in the home of a Hindu, according to government reports.
ARSA victims of the terrorist attacks missing Hinduism to find out the condition of the 93 fastest search to promote national consultant she Rakhine state, on September 22, at the meetings of the Committee on implementation of the recommendations and guidelines . All driver Seik village near Maungdaw Bengalis living in villages in the nearest National is more than three miles away.
Dan Kitwood—Getty ImagesA Rohingya man helps an elderly woman reach the Bangladeshi shore from the boat in which they escaped Myanmar
Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi was long hailed as the hero of human rights in her homeland. But the forced exodus of nearly half a million minority Rohingya has changed that
The satellites first detected the villages going up in flames on Aug. 25. One by one, entire townships across western Myanmar were burning, just hours after Muslim militants attacked national army posts in the Asian country’s Rakhine state.
Soon a new crush of refugees was pouring into neighboring Bangladesh. Tens of thousands of Rohingya, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group in majority-Buddhist Myanmar, were fleeing the army’s apparent retaliation. Refugees told aid workers that the military had set fire to their homes and planted land mines on their escape routes. Myanmar’s soldiers, they said, were shooting Rohingya women and children as they fled.
This was not the first time the Myanmar army had attacked the Rohingya, but the scale was far greater than ever before. More than 200 villages burned over the next three weeks. More than 420,000 Rohingya flooded refugee camps, and nearly two-thirds were children. Humanitarian aid agencies UNICEF and Médecins Sans Frontières were denied access to conflict areas. The U.N. human-rights chief called the crisis “a textbook example of ethnic cleansing.”
In Myanmar, one voice remained notably silent. Human-rights icon and Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, now the de facto leader of Myanmar’s civilian government, did not condemn the atrocities. Fellow laureates were quick to point out the contradiction. Pakistani human-rights activist Malala Yousafzai said “the world is waiting” for her to speak out. South African clergyman Desmond Tutu prayed that Suu Kyi would be “courageous and resilient again.” Instead, Suu Kyi blamed “a misinformation campaign” and announced she would no longer attend the U.N. General Assembly in late September.
The period before Suu Kyi belatedly collected the Nobel was particularly grim. In 2012, Human Rights Watch documented coordinated government attacks on Muslim villages, mass arrests and blocked aid, part of what they described as an effort to forcibly displace the Rohingya population. When she was receiving the Congressional Gold Medal, tens of thousands of Rohingya fled again. When she was asked in Europe that summer if the Rohingya were Burmese, she replied, “I do not know.” The remarks raised red flags. “People were surprised,” Derek Mitchell, U.S. ambassador to Myanmar under Obama, recalls. “She was never quite able to address the Rohingya issue to people’s satisfaction overseas.”
In 2015, three years after Suu Kyi had been elected as a lawmaker, Myanmar held its first free elections in 25 years and her party won a landslide victory. Suu Kyi was made State Counsellor, a new position created for her, similar to Prime Minister.
Her powers, though, were limited and the democracy more fragile than anyone wanted to admit. Myanmar’s constitution, written in 2008 by the then ruling military junta, guarantees the army 25% of seats in parliament and veto power over any constitutional change. Suu Kyi cannot become President because her children are British citizens. Even if she could, the army controls key ministries, including Home Affairs, Border Affairs and Defence, under the leadership of commander-in-chief Senior General Min Aung Hlaing. “The NLD’s 2015 campaign promise was that they were the only political party that could confront the military,” says human-rights activist Cheery Zahau in Myanmar. “They have to live up to that promise.”
In May 2016, Suu Kyi told then U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry that her country needed “space” to address the Rohingya crisis. She advised officials to not use the term Rohingya, arguing to the U.N. that the choice would promote harmony. “She always felt people outside Burma didn’t understand [the Rohingya issue’s] complexities,” says Mitchell. “She’d try to explain, but she has not proven very effective at strategic communication.”
APA Rohingya village burning in Rakhine state on Sept. 7.
The Obama White House tried to push Suu Kyi to embrace the international community’s help in Rakhine. In dozens of meetings with Obama or senior Administration officials, Suu Kyi would “generally say the right things” about the need to protect human rights and minority rights and to pursue citizenship solutions, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser Rhodes says, but she repeatedly argued that she could only go so far.
“She would argue that if she essentially tried to open the door to the international community playing a much greater role there, that would potentially undercut her assuming civilian control of the military,” Rhodes says. “We, and particularly our embassy, would really keep the focus on this issue, and that would at times allow for more incremental progress, like improved humanitarian access, but we were unable to, in the context of their divided politics, secure more structural changes, like addressing the citizenship status of the Rohingya.”
In 2016, Suu Kyi sat down with Obama in the Oval Office. Obama, hoping the message on democratic reforms had been received in Myanmar, lifted U.S. sanctions that had been in place for almost two decades. “Essentially you were restricting the type of investment that could pull Burma toward the international community,” Rhodes says. “We believed that if she and her government were more stable and confident in their position, that they would be in a stronger place to take risks on behalf of the Rohingya.”
Human-rights activists worried that only made things worse. “The message to the army was, you can get away with a token democratic concession, you can retain control, let Aung San Suu Kyi be the figurehead, you don’t have to stop your abuses against the ethnic groups, and the sanctions are all gone,” says Roth, the Human Rights Watch executive director. “The Obama Administration was much too quick to claim victory, so it does deserve some of the blame for what has happened now.”
The Trump administration has been far less engaged. Trump himself has not spoken to Suu Kyi since taking office, according to a National Security Council (NSC) spokesperson. Ambassador Joseph Yun, the special envoy for North Korea policy, visited Myanmar in July and met with Suu Kyi and the army chief, but his trip focused solely on the U.S. relationship with North Korea, not on the Rohingya or humanitarian issues, according to a State Department spokesperson.
Now the scale of the recent violence against the Rohingya may force Trump’s hand. Trump discussed the crisis with Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak when he visited Washington in early September, and they agreed that Myanmar needed to end the crisis and allow humanitarian aid. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called Suu Kyi, urging the government and the military to facilitate humanitarian aid. The next day, the State Department announced an additional $32 million in aid to help the Rohingya. Deputy Assistant Secretary for Southeast Asia Patrick Murphy visited Naypyidaw for Suu Kyi’s speech and sat in the front row. He then visited Sittwe, the capital of Rakhine, but local Burmese officials stated that he would not be allowed to visit the conflict areas to the north, citing security concerns. An NSC spokesperson tells TIME that military-to-military engagement between the U.S. and Myanmar has so far been nascent and that moving forward will be difficult until Myanmar’s security forces stop the violence and displacement. “We particularly welcome Aung San Suu Kyi’s commitment that Burma will accept the return of Rohingya refugees when it is safe to do so,” State Department spokesperson Justin Higgins says. “We call on Burma to allow an investigation into the allegation of abuses.”
In Congress, a range of reactions is on display. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, who has championed Suu Kyi for decades, called her the week before her speech as public pressure on her rose. He then defended her to the Senate. “She is the same person she was before,” he said. “She is trying to improve conditions.” Senator John McCain of Arizona wrote her a letter, asking her to reverse her decision denying U.N. Human Rights Council access to northern Rakhine. McCain and others also struck language from the National Defense Authorization Act that would have increased U.S. military-to-military engagements with Myanmar’s army. Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, who participated in Suu Kyi’s Congressional Gold Medal ceremony in 2012, wants Congress to re-evaluate its relationship with the army and Suu Kyi’s government. “At the very least, the leaders who planned and executed this campaign of ethnic cleansing should be sanctioned, all military-to-military contact should be suspended, and preferential trade benefits with Burma should be ended,” she told TIME.
Dar Yasin—APA Rohingya woman grieves for her infant son, who died when their boat capsized off Bangladesh on Sept. 14.
At this junction, managing the military in Myanmar remains crucial, says the country’s top Catholic official, Cardinal Charles Maung Bo of Yangon, appointed by Pope Francis. “Aung San Suu Kyi is walking a tightrope walk,” he says. “Already dark forces are clamoring for return to army rule.”
Helping the Rohingya was an urgent topic at the annual gathering of the U.N. General Assembly in mid-September. Global leaders, from the U.N. Secretary-General to U.S. Vice President Mike Pence to European and Asian ministers, discussed the crisis in a series of meetings and speeches. But Trump did not mention Myanmar or the Rohingya crisis in his address to the body.
At home, Suu Kyi wants the world to absorb a different narrative. Hers is a young democracy, she said in her speech, and the world cannot expect it to overcome its challenges in the 18 short months since she has been State Counsellor. She argued that Muslims in Rakhine have equal access to health care and education “without any discrimination,” counter to human-rights groups’ reports. She offered for foreign diplomats to visit Rakhine, but only the parts where Muslims have not fled, so that the international community could learn “why they have chosen to remain in their villages.” Before she spoke, supporters gathered in the capital holding signs supporting her. But others are disappointed. “She was our role model, our icon, our leader, and we loved her because of her values,” says Chit Min Lay, a democracy activist and former political prisoner in Myanmar. “Some people say she’s being pragmatic, but I don’t know why she’s acting this way.”
Two months from now, a new moral leader will draw the world’s attention to the Rohingya. Pope Francis will visit Myanmar in late November, followed by a visit to Bangladesh. The Vatican established diplomatic relations with Myanmar just four months ago, under his leadership, and unlike Suu Kyi, he has regularly defended the Rohingya by name. The expectations for his trip are as high as the challenges, at home and abroad. “I do hope he will address many issues of all people in Myanmar in a way that brings healing, not hatred,” Bo says. “That is the challenge since a section here is not happy to see the real peace.”
Through it all, the Rohingya suffer. Human-rights groups on the ground say the military operations in Rakhine continue, though Suu Kyi claims they ended on Sept. 5. Bangladesh is planning to build a new refugee camp with 14,000 shelters to accommodate the nearly half a million people who have arrived in the past month. The U.N. resident coordinator in Bangladesh, Robert Watkins, believes there could be at least 100,000 more people lined up inside Myanmar trying to cross the Naf River to safety. “They all come with the same story. Their villages have been burned, there are reports of rape, of family members being killed,” he says. “Sadly, no one family’s misery is worse than any other.”
Not Afraid of International Scrutiny: Suu Kyi on Rohingya Crisis
After a mass exodus of Rohingya Muslims sparked allegations of ethnic cleansing, Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi said today her country does not fear international scrutiny.
Indigenous people need to protect and secure of main ethnic very important for the nation of the Union for us.
Did you know?
Why?
How you going on, unbelievable. You should keep your Glory Ray ,honesty.
Actually, Bengali mean ARSA aggressive to myanmar and our peoples of dine,myo,thet, rakhanie and etc were killed, why they commit like that, we also suffered.now mostly freed from their land ,why you more pity to Bengali? And local people of hindu also suffered because killed by terrorism.
ARSA Rohingyas are targeting would be crowd into makeshift camps Bengali refugee. Attacked first terrorists muslims and then they make first lying & crying upload as attacked as by other on their muslims around the world.
The main sponsor is Muslim world as support to western media'swill drive own agenda trying to get all Politicians to condemn the Myanmar and ignore the Bengali becoming another Isis regime. These illegals immigrants used by the Bengali must return native home.
That's a glaring DOUBLE STANDARD and I can see why fake news and conspiracy right-wing media outlets say there is a Muslim/ Islam bias in main stream news.
They are crazy but in this regard I totally agree with them. I also don't think I'm the only Progressive who notices this pro-Muslim/ Pro-Islam bias on Western Media's.
Western Media's double standard unmines it's credibility as a place for FAIR UNBIASED reporting.
If you let the Western humanitarian organisations and fake news msm into your country, your terrorists will end up with heavy machine guns and anti-tank rockets. Get it sorted. Urgently.
If You bring in mosquitoes into your homes and you don't expect to have malaria ?
You've brought radical Islamic terrorists into your homes in the guise of multi-culturalism.
Send these terrorists disguising as innocent migrants home.
Your prayers to Your's Counties!
Local media can't upload larest new for English version on time, they'd be Burmese version only on time then Who known this real happines so larested. So sad & Worries about that!
Firstest than fake new for most power musilm & Westean Media only, How to dare?
Why muslim is fighting with Christian,Hindu,Jews and now with buddhist,they should accept nation first and religion then. They should review and revisit Islam so they can live peaceful with other religion.
Buddha + Christian = No problem
Buddha + Hindi = No problem
Hindi + Christian = No problem
Buddhist + Muslims = Problem
Christian + Muslims = Problem
Hindi + Muslims = Problem
Muslim + Muslim = Big Problem... Right?
Open your eyes & look into the world .
i don't mean every Muslim is terrorism but every terrorist is Muslim all over the world...
Attacked first terrorists muslims and then they make first lying & crying upload as attacked as by other on their muslims around the world.
Terrorism is on the rise – but there’s a bigger threat we’re not talking about!~
Thousands of Muslims killed........Muslims silent !
Iraq Kuwait war...
Thousands of Kuwaitis killed……..Muslims silent !
30 lakh Bengalis genocide in Bangladesh by Pakistan army in 1971……..Muslims silent !
Thousands of balochss.. pashtoons..Shias ahmedis killed in Pakistan till now date…….Muslims silent!
More than 40 lakh Afghanis killed by Pakistani paid dogs (Taliban,,hakkani)……..Muslim silent!
Saudi Yemen war…
More than 40,000 civilians killed in Saudi airstrikes ……..Muslims silent !
Iran killing Balochs and Kurds…..Muslims silent !
Bangladeshis and Pakistanis massacring non muslims……..Muslims silent!
But when Kashmiris after picking up arms get killed fighting
The Muslim world start shouting.....
When isreal shot dead Hammas terrorists..
And Palestinians while fighting
Every Muslim countries start shouting.....
When Buddhist are doing this whole Muslims world start crying Is this your humanity?
This humanity is only for Muslim world......
Your agenda only against non Muslims of worlds...
Double standard, Taqqiya!
..• AL-HAM 🐷-DO-IT-LA • ..
Please do share this far & wide for tyranny has NO place in any well-informed society ...
Sometimes, opening our eyes could be the most painful experience ever.
I'm a Progressive and I watch CNN daily, but I just noticed in the latest Rakhine State vilence the report called some Myanmar citizens 'Buddhist-extremist'.
Mmm.... CNN and the VOA,RFA,BBC and The guardian have no qualms describing these extremists as 'Buddhist', BUT when it comes to Muslim terrorists from Barcelona to Baghdad are called 'Islamist terrorists' and not 'Muslim'.
That's a glaring DOUBLE STANDARD and I can see why fake news and conspiracy right-wing media outlets say there is a Muslim/ Islam bias in main stream news.
They are crazy but in this regard I totally agree with them. I also don't think I'm the only Progressive who notices this pro-Muslim/ Pro-Islam bias on CNN.
CNN should stop the bias because we will start getting our real UNBIASED news from news sites that call a 'spade a spade', i.e. 'Muslim extremists'.
CNN's double standard unmines it's credibility as a place for FAIR UNBIASED reporting.
Aung San Suu Kyi award suspended by UK union over Myanmar crisis
Unison one of a number of institutions in Britain to withdraw honours in response to humanitarian crisis
Aung San Suu Kyi has come in for widespread criticism for her response to attacks against the Rohingya people. Photograph: Soe Zeya Tun/Reuters
Mason Boycott-Owen
One of Britain’s largest trade unions has suspended an award given toAung San Suu Kyiduring her time as a political prisoner, as international criticism mounts over her tepid response to Myanmar’s humanitarian crisis.
The move comes as a number of British institutions say they are reviewing or removing honours bestowed on Aung San Suu Kyi during her campaign for democracy under Myanmar’s oppressive military junta.
Unison, the country’s second largest trade union, announced that it is to suspend Suu Kyi’s honorary membership, and urged Myanmar’s de facto leader to do more to denounce the plight of the country’s Rohingya people.
“The situation facing the Rohingya ofMyanmaris appalling,” Margaret McKee, Unison’s president, told the Guardian. “Aung San Suu Kyi’s honorary membership of Unison has been suspended, and we hope that she responds to international pressure.”
Bristol University, one of a string of universities that awarded honorary degrees to the Burmese leader during her time in opposition, also said it wasreviewing its awardin light of accusations of brutal mistreatment of the Rohingya, described by the UN as a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing”.
“The university shares the growing concern with the ongoing situation in Myanmar,” a spokesperson for Bristol university said.
“In 1998 we awarded an honorary degree of doctor of laws to Dr Aung San Suu Kyi, who at the time was leading the struggle for human rights and democracy in the then Burma.
“In terms of this award it would be wrong to make any decision at this time to consider revoking such an honour but we will continue to monitor and review the situation as necessary.”
The London School of Economics student union said it would be stripping the former political prisoner of her honorary presidency.
“We will be actively removing Aung San Suu Kyi’s honorary presidency as a symbol of our opposition to her current position and inaction in the face of genocide,” said Mahatir Pasha, the union’s general secretary.
Over the last 30 years Aung San Suu Kyi has been awarded with honorary degrees from several UK universities including Glasgow, Bath and Cambridge, as well as the freedom of several cities, and other honours.
Oxford councillors have announced that they may reconsider the freedom of the city of Oxford awarded to Aung San Suu Kyi in 1997 at next month’s council meeting.
“If nothing changes, I think it is very likely that the city council will be stripping her of the freedom of the city,” John Tanner, an Oxford council board member,told the Oxford Mail.
“It’s something that we very much regret but clearly the reasons for giving her support have now changed.”
Aung San Suu Kyi has close links with the city of Oxford, having studied at St Hugh’s College there as an undergraduate in the 1960s. Her late husband, Michael Aris, was an academic at the university.
As a leader of Myanmar’s opposition Aung San Suu Kyi won international praise and a Nobel peace prize in 1991. Despite being barred from running for president, she won a decisive victory in the country’s 2015 election, and was eventually given a title of state counsellor.
But in recent months she has been the object of criticism for her failure to stem the attacks against the Rohingya, a Muslim ethnic minority living along the border with Bangladesh.
Among the critics has been Malala Yousafzai, herself a Nobel peace prize laureate, who earlier this monthcalled on Aung San Suu Kyi to condemnthe “tragic and shameful” treatment of the Rohingya after violence that left hundreds dead
The prime minister, Theresa May, has been under pressure to act after Myanmar’s military forces were accused of driving hundreds of thousands of Rohingya out of the country.
“We are very concerned about what’s happening to the Rohingya people,” May said, calling on Aung San Suu Kyi “to make it very clear that the military action should stop”.
On Tuesday May announced that the UK would be suspending the training of the Burmese military by the Ministry of Defence “until this issue is resolved”.
But in a speech this week Aung San Suu Kyi failed to roundly condemn the military forces, and instead claimed that there had been “no conflicts since 5 September and no clearance operations” against the country’s Muslim minority.
Amnesty International called the speech a “mix of untruths and victim-blaming”.
Since you’re here …
we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. Andunlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.
I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information.Thomasine F-R.
